
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
2023Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅31.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 107 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 359 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 305 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 247 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 197 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 113 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 511 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 255 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 383 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 255 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 192 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 255 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 204 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,353 points.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) scores 11,353 and the Radeon Pro 5700 reaches 11,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,353 | 11,469+1% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+33% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+87% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz+40% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 144+50% |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 12.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W-12% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 98.7+12% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | AD107 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #102 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












