Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro 570

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 570

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1105 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
  • Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 33.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $400 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 29.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro T1000 better than Radeon Pro 570?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,505 vs 6,337 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro T1000 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 120W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro T1000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro T1000 is about 33.3% more expensive on MSRP at $400 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 2.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 570 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon Pro 570 is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 6,337 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low91 FPS78 FPS
medium82 FPS67 FPS
high67 FPS55 FPS
ultra55 FPS36 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS69 FPS
medium73 FPS60 FPS
high57 FPS43 FPS
ultra47 FPS27 FPS
4K
low40 FPS25 FPS
medium38 FPS24 FPS
high26 FPS15 FPS
ultra23 FPS13 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low145 FPS158 FPS
medium108 FPS123 FPS
high76 FPS91 FPS
ultra50 FPS65 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS110 FPS
medium60 FPS82 FPS
high45 FPS63 FPS
ultra33 FPS46 FPS
4K
low41 FPS56 FPS
medium29 FPS44 FPS
high24 FPS35 FPS
ultra17 FPS25 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low293 FPS285 FPS
medium234 FPS228 FPS
high195 FPS190 FPS
ultra146 FPS143 FPS
1440p
low220 FPS214 FPS
medium176 FPS171 FPS
high146 FPS143 FPS
ultra110 FPS107 FPS
4K
low139 FPS143 FPS
medium117 FPS114 FPS
high84 FPS95 FPS
ultra55 FPS71 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low268 FPS153 FPS
medium202 FPS126 FPS
high169 FPS110 FPS
ultra142 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low213 FPS112 FPS
medium161 FPS93 FPS
high127 FPS82 FPS
ultra105 FPS68 FPS
4K
low97 FPS66 FPS
medium74 FPS53 FPS
high65 FPS42 FPS
ultra52 FPS32 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 570

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score
6,505+3%
6,337
Architecture
Turing
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Boost Clock
1455 MHz+32%
1105 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
TDP
50W-58%
120W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
130.1+146%
52.8
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 25% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 29.4% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro T1000Radeon Pro 570
MSRP
$400
$300-25%
Performance per Dollar
16.3
21.1+29%
Codename
TU117
Polaris 20
Release
May 27 2019
June 5 2017
Ranking
#376
#382