
Quadro T1000
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro T1000
2019Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Quadro T1000
2019Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 120W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.3% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌140% higher power demand at 120W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 268 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 142 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 213 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 scores 6,505 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,505+3% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz+32% | 1105 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 82.4% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-58% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 156mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 130.1+146% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1000 launched at $400 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 25% less ($100 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.3 (Quadro T1000) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 29.4% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.3 | 21.1+29% |
| Codename | TU117 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | May 27 2019 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #376 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












