
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
2018Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P3200 Max-Q better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 137 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 86 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 195 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 111 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3200 Max-Q and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1139 MHz to 1404 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 5.032 TFLOPS (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1404 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+3% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.032 TFLOPS+27% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1404 MHz+27% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB+50% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3200 Max-Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+64% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3200 Max-Q | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | February 21 2018 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #292 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












