
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌100% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro P3000 (móvel) better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 570 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 208 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 230 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 192 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 215 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,385 | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1792+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.11 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz+10% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112+40% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB+7% | 448 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-38% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 85.1+61% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 50% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 99.1% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $300-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.6 | 21.1+99% |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #380 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












