Quadro P3000 vs Radeon Pro 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P3000

2016

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quadro P3000

2016

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 98.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
100% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro P3000 better than Radeon Pro 570?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,384 vs 6,337 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro P3000 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P3000 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro P3000 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Quadro P3000 is about 100.0% more expensive on MSRP at $600 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 570 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Pro 570 make more sense than Quadro P3000?

Yes. Radeon Pro 570 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (120W vs 250W), and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro P3000. The trade-off is that Quadro P3000 currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 570 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	141 FPS	78 FPS
medium	130 FPS	67 FPS
high	110 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	125 FPS	69 FPS
medium	107 FPS	60 FPS
high	89 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	70 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	25 FPS
medium	50 FPS	24 FPS
high	41 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	13 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon Pro 570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	287 FPS	158 FPS
medium	230 FPS	123 FPS
high	192 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	110 FPS
medium	172 FPS	82 FPS
high	144 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	102 FPS	56 FPS
medium	83 FPS	44 FPS
high	70 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	25 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon Pro 570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	287 FPS	285 FPS
medium	230 FPS	228 FPS
high	192 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	214 FPS
medium	172 FPS	171 FPS
high	144 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	143 FPS
medium	115 FPS	114 FPS
high	96 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	71 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon Pro 570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	287 FPS	153 FPS
medium	230 FPS	126 FPS
high	192 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	144 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	215 FPS	112 FPS
medium	172 FPS	93 FPS
high	144 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	108 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	144 FPS	66 FPS
medium	115 FPS	53 FPS
high	96 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	32 FPS

Open Quadro P3000 Open Radeon Pro 570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 and Radeon Pro 570

Quadro P3000

The Quadro P3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,384 points. Launch price was $5,999.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 scores 6,384 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P3000) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	6,384	6,337
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 4.0
Process Node	16 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+114%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+219%	3.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz+49%	1105 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+114%	112
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+218%	0.44 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P3000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Quadro P3000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P3000) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Quadro P3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+50%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P3000	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	250W	120W-52%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.5	52.8+107%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro P3000 launched at $600 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 50% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.6 (Quadro P3000) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 99.1% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).