
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌116.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $349 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 110.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 10.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌116.3% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 better than Radeon Pro 570?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 570 make more sense than GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 39 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 234 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 195 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 117 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 102 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 10 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 863 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,500 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 scores 6,500 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 4.156 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,500+3% | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.156 TFLOPS+5% | 3.96 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 902 MHz | 1105 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+71% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 70.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 120W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 26.0 | 52.8+103% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 launched at $649 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Radeon Pro 570 costs 53.8% less ($349 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 10.0 (GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 111% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $300-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.0 | 21.1+111% |
| Codename | GK110B | Polaris 20 |
| Release | September 10 2013 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #487 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












