
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016Radeon Pro 570
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $160 less on MSRP ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 114.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 120W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅32.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$140 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 45.4 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
- ❌71.4% higher power demand at 120W vs 70W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1050 Ti make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 228 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 171 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 107 FPS | 107 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 71 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 185 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 96 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 53 FPS |
| high | 57 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 32 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and Radeon Pro 570

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 25 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1392 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,350 points. Launch price was $139.

Radeon Pro 570
Radeon Pro 570
The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti scores 6,350 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 2.138 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 1392 MHz vs 1105 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,350 | 6,337 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1792+133% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.138 TFLOPS | 3.96 TFLOPS+85% |
| Boost Clock | 1392 MHz+26% | 1105 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 112+133% |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB | 448 KB+56% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 570 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti draws 70W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 70W-42% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 211mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+72% | 52.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti launched at $140 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti costs 53.3% less ($160 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.4 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti offers 115.2% better value. The Radeon Pro 570 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti | Radeon Pro 570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $140-53% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.4+115% | 21.1 |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | October 25 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #381 | #382 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













