Arc Graphics 130T vs Radeon Pro 570

CPU

GPU

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Radeon Pro 570

2017Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1105 MHz

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Arc Graphics 130T

Shared 15

6,208

0.0%

Arc 8-Core iGPU

Arc Graphics 130V

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

6,337

+2.1%

Radeon RX 550 (móvel)

Radeon RX 460 (móvel)

Radeon R9 M395

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.

Arc Graphics 130T

2025

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro 570: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro 570 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 15W instead of 120W, a 105W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌700% higher power demand at 120W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than Arc Graphics 130T?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,208 vs 6,337 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 570 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc Graphics 130T is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2017 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 570 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro 570 is in basically the same MSRP band at $300 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and you are getting 2.1% higher G3D Mark. Arc Graphics 130T really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Arc Graphics 130T make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?

Yes. Arc Graphics 130T is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still fine for 1080p, but 1440p and especially 4K require more compromise. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 120W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $300 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 570. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 570 currently gives you 2.1% higher G3D Mark. It only holds a slight 2.1% edge in G3D-per-dollar, so the value lead is real but narrow.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc Graphics 130T Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	80 FPS	78 FPS
medium	70 FPS	67 FPS
high	50 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	69 FPS
medium	58 FPS	60 FPS
high	37 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	24 FPS	25 FPS
medium	23 FPS	24 FPS
high	14 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	13 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 130T Open Radeon Pro 570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	121 FPS	158 FPS
medium	85 FPS	123 FPS
high	58 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	80 FPS	110 FPS
medium	48 FPS	82 FPS
high	35 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	38 FPS	56 FPS
medium	25 FPS	44 FPS
high	20 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	25 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 130T Open Radeon Pro 570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	279 FPS	285 FPS
medium	223 FPS	228 FPS
high	176 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	140 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	210 FPS	214 FPS
medium	168 FPS	171 FPS
high	140 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	140 FPS	143 FPS
medium	112 FPS	114 FPS
high	78 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	57 FPS	71 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 130T Open Radeon Pro 570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	139 FPS	153 FPS
medium	109 FPS	126 FPS
high	88 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	103 FPS	112 FPS
medium	81 FPS	93 FPS
high	64 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	63 FPS	66 FPS
medium	49 FPS	53 FPS
high	39 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	32 FPS

Open Arc Graphics 130T Open Radeon Pro 570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc Graphics 130T and Radeon Pro 570

Arc Graphics 130T

The Arc Graphics 130T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. It has 7 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,208 points.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc Graphics 130T scores 6,208 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc Graphics 130T is built on Xe+ while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0. Shader units: 7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570).

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	6,208	6,337+2%
Architecture	Xe+	GCN 4.0
Shading Units	7	1792+25500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc Graphics 130T comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 570 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	Shared	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR6
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc Graphics 130T draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 155.6% difference. The Arc Graphics 130T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc Graphics 130T	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	15W-88%	120W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	413.9+684%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc Graphics 130T launched at $300 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 20.7 (Arc Graphics 130T) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Radeon Pro 570 offers 1.9% better value. The Arc Graphics 130T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).