Arc A380 vs Radeon Pro 570

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Arc A380

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

Arc A380

2022

Radeon Pro 570

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 100.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 42.3 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 120W, a 45W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
101.3% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 42.3 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌60% higher power demand at 120W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 570 better than Arc A380?

Yes. Radeon Pro 570 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 6,337 vs 6,301 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro 570 is a 2017 card with FSR upscaling, while Arc A380 is a 2022 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Arc A380 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro 570 is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro 570 is about 101.3% more expensive on MSRP at $300 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Arc A380 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Arc A380 make more sense than Radeon Pro 570?

Yes. Arc A380 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 120W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $149 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 570. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 570 currently gives you 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Arc A380 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Arc A380 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 570 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	128 FPS	78 FPS
medium	114 FPS	67 FPS
high	96 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	72 FPS	36 FPS
1440p
low	118 FPS	69 FPS
medium	99 FPS	60 FPS
high	81 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	61 FPS	27 FPS
4K
low	52 FPS	25 FPS
medium	48 FPS	24 FPS
high	35 FPS	15 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	13 FPS

Open Arc A380 Open Radeon Pro 570

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	137 FPS	158 FPS
medium	101 FPS	123 FPS
high	72 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	65 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	110 FPS
medium	61 FPS	82 FPS
high	45 FPS	63 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	41 FPS	56 FPS
medium	30 FPS	44 FPS
high	25 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	18 FPS	25 FPS

Open Arc A380 Open Radeon Pro 570

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	284 FPS	285 FPS
medium	227 FPS	228 FPS
high	189 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	143 FPS
1440p
low	213 FPS	214 FPS
medium	170 FPS	171 FPS
high	142 FPS	143 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	107 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	143 FPS
medium	113 FPS	114 FPS
high	95 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	71 FPS

Open Arc A380 Open Radeon Pro 570

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
1080p
low	284 FPS	153 FPS
medium	227 FPS	126 FPS
high	189 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	142 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	213 FPS	112 FPS
medium	170 FPS	93 FPS
high	142 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	68 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	66 FPS
medium	113 FPS	53 FPS
high	95 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	32 FPS

Open Arc A380 Open Radeon Pro 570

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Arc A380 and Radeon Pro 570

Arc A380

The Arc A380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in June 14 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,301 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon Pro 570

The Radeon Pro 570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1105 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,337 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Arc A380 scores 6,301 and the Radeon Pro 570 reaches 6,337 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A380 is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Pro 570 uses GCN 4.0, both on 6 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Arc A380) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro 570). Raw compute: 4.198 TFLOPS (Arc A380) vs 3.96 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 570). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 1105 MHz.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
G3D Mark Score	6,301	6,337
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 4.0
Process Node	6 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1024	1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.198 TFLOPS+6%	3.96 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2050 MHz+86%	1105 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	112+75%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Arc A380 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 570 has 4 GB. The Arc A380 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Arc A380) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 570) — the Arc A380 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	96-bit	128-bit+33%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Arc A380 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 570's 120W — a 46.2% difference. The Arc A380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Arc A380) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 570). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Arc A380	Radeon Pro 570
TDP	75W-38%	120W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	190mm	—
Height	114mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	59	—
Perf/Watt	84.0+59%	52.8

💰

Value Analysis

The Arc A380 launched at $149 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 570 launched at $300. The Arc A380 costs 50.3% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 42.3 (Arc A380) vs 21.1 (Radeon Pro 570) — the Arc A380 offers 100.5% better value. The Arc A380 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).