
Radeon Pro 455
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro 455
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 455
2016Radeon Pro 555
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 555 better than Radeon Pro 455?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 455 make more sense than Radeon Pro 555?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 108 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 101 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro 455 and Radeon Pro 555

Radeon Pro 455
Radeon Pro 455
The Radeon Pro 455 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 855 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,113 points.

Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 555
The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro 455 scores 3,113 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro 455 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 768 (Radeon Pro 455) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.313 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 455) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,113 | 3,141 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.313 TFLOPS | 1.306 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 48 | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro 455 draws 35W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 455 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro 455) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-53% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.9+112% | 41.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 455 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon Pro 455) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers NaN% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro 455 | Radeon Pro 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Baffin | Polaris 21 |
| Release | October 30 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #577 | #574 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












