Quadro M1200 vs Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 555

2017Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro M1200 better than Radeon Pro 555?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,212 vs 3,141 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro M1200 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (45W vs 75W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M1200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro M1200 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro M1200 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro M1200 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.3% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you lower power draw (45W vs 75W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon Pro 555 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon Pro 555 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Quadro M1200 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
1080p
low34 FPS47 FPS
medium21 FPS29 FPS
high13 FPS20 FPS
ultra6 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS31 FPS
medium9 FPS19 FPS
high4 FPS10 FPS
ultra2 FPS5 FPS
4K
low5 FPS10 FPS
medium3 FPS7 FPS
high2 FPS4 FPS
ultra1 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
1080p
low79 FPS67 FPS
medium49 FPS38 FPS
high37 FPS27 FPS
ultra22 FPS17 FPS
1440p
low36 FPS30 FPS
medium27 FPS18 FPS
high17 FPS12 FPS
ultra12 FPS9 FPS
4K
low12 FPS8 FPS
medium9 FPS6 FPS
high8 FPS5 FPS
ultra5 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
1080p
low145 FPS141 FPS
medium116 FPS113 FPS
high96 FPS94 FPS
ultra72 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS106 FPS
medium87 FPS85 FPS
high72 FPS71 FPS
ultra54 FPS53 FPS
4K
low72 FPS71 FPS
medium58 FPS57 FPS
high48 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
1080p
low145 FPS141 FPS
medium116 FPS113 FPS
high96 FPS94 FPS
ultra72 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low108 FPS106 FPS
medium87 FPS85 FPS
high72 FPS71 FPS
ultra54 FPS53 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium56 FPS55 FPS
high46 FPS44 FPS
ultra35 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
G3D Mark Score
3,212+2%
3,141
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
640
768+20%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.399 TFLOPS+7%
1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
48+20%
L1 Cache
320 KB+67%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 555 has 2 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
TDP
45W-40%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
71.4+70%
41.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers NaN% better value.

FeatureQuadro M1200Radeon Pro 555
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GM107
Polaris 21
Release
January 11 2017
June 5 2017
Ranking
#567
#574