GRID P4-2Q vs Radeon Pro 555

GRID P4-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 555

2017Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID P4-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 555

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GRID P4-2Q better than Radeon Pro 555?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 3,162 vs 3,141 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID P4-2Q is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P4-2Q is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID P4-2Q can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,500 MSRP. GRID P4-2Q is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GRID P4-2Q is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $1,500 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 555 is the newer 2017 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (75W vs 225W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro 555 make more sense than GRID P4-2Q?
Yes. Radeon Pro 555 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 225W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID P4-2Q. The trade-off is that GRID P4-2Q currently gives you 0.7% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
1080p
low103 FPS47 FPS
medium85 FPS29 FPS
high67 FPS20 FPS
ultra40 FPS10 FPS
1440p
low86 FPS31 FPS
medium72 FPS19 FPS
high51 FPS10 FPS
ultra29 FPS5 FPS
4K
low28 FPS10 FPS
medium26 FPS7 FPS
high17 FPS4 FPS
ultra15 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
1080p
low128 FPS67 FPS
medium101 FPS38 FPS
high82 FPS27 FPS
ultra63 FPS17 FPS
1440p
low88 FPS30 FPS
medium65 FPS18 FPS
high53 FPS12 FPS
ultra40 FPS9 FPS
4K
low41 FPS8 FPS
medium32 FPS6 FPS
high29 FPS5 FPS
ultra24 FPS3 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
1080p
low142 FPS141 FPS
medium114 FPS113 FPS
high95 FPS94 FPS
ultra71 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS106 FPS
medium85 FPS85 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS53 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS57 FPS
high47 FPS47 FPS
ultra36 FPS35 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
1080p
low142 FPS141 FPS
medium114 FPS113 FPS
high95 FPS94 FPS
ultra71 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low107 FPS106 FPS
medium85 FPS85 FPS
high71 FPS71 FPS
ultra53 FPS53 FPS
4K
low71 FPS71 FPS
medium57 FPS55 FPS
high47 FPS44 FPS
ultra36 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P4-2Q and Radeon Pro 555

NVIDIA

GRID P4-2Q

The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 555

The Radeon Pro 555 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,141 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID P4-2Q scores 3,162 and the Radeon Pro 555 reaches 3,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P4-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 555 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q) vs 768 (Radeon Pro 555). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 555).

FeatureGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
G3D Mark Score
3,162
3,141
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+167%
768
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+269%
1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
128+167%
48
L1 Cache
768 KB+300%
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 555) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P4-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 555's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 555 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P4-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
TDP
225W
75W-67%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
14.1
41.9+197%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P4-2Q launched at $1500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 555 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 555 costs 100+% less ($1500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (GRID P4-2Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 555) — the Radeon Pro 555 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 555 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P4-2QRadeon Pro 555
MSRP
$1500
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
2.1
Infinity
Codename
GM204
Polaris 21
Release
August 30 2015
June 5 2017
Ranking
#433
#574