
Quadro M5500
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M5500
2016Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅51.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $601 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 301.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 150W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌302% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 39.7 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 150W vs 125W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M5500 better than Radeon Pro 5500 XT?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5500 XT make more sense than Quadro M5500?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 229 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 356 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 285 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 237 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 214 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 134 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 119 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 234 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 164 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 140 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5500 and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

Quadro M5500
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,915 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.772 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+13% |
| Boost Clock | 1165 MHz | 1757 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Maxwell) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 125W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 63.3+20% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M5500 launched at $800 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT launched at $199. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT costs 75.1% less ($601 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro M5500) vs 39.7 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT offers 301% better value. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $199-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 39.7+301% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #321 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













