
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
2017Radeon Pro 5500 XT
2020Why buy it
- ✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 125W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 39.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 39.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌56.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5500 XT better than GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 167 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 115 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 41 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 350 FPS |
| medium | 283 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 236 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 177 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 265 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 177 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 88 FPS | 76 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 214 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 147 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Pro 5500 XT

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,853 points.

Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,910 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design scores 7,853 and the Radeon Pro 5500 XT reaches 7,910 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Raw compute: 3.789 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1480 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,853 | 7,910 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1536+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.789 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 1480 MHz | 1757 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5500 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5500 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5500 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5500 XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT's 125W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-36% | 125W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 98.2+55% | 63.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 5500 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Codename | GP106 | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #401 | #322 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













