GeForce MX570 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce MX570

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

GeForce MX570

2022

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 85W, a 60W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 38.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌240% higher power demand at 85W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro 5300M better than GeForce MX570?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,738 vs 5,853 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro 5300M is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX570 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2022 generation instead of 2019 and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce MX570 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $150 MSRP. Radeon Pro 5300M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro 5300M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and you are getting 2.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX570 is the newer 2022 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 85W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does GeForce MX570 make more sense than Radeon Pro 5300M?

Yes. GeForce MX570 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (25W vs 85W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $150 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro 5300M. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro 5300M currently gives you 2.0% higher G3D Mark. GeForce MX570 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce MX570 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 5300M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	103 FPS	98 FPS
medium	88 FPS	85 FPS
high	72 FPS	67 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	88 FPS
medium	78 FPS	76 FPS
high	56 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	31 FPS
4K
low	29 FPS	28 FPS
medium	27 FPS	27 FPS
high	18 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	171 FPS	125 FPS
medium	137 FPS	87 FPS
high	106 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	40 FPS
1440p
low	124 FPS	82 FPS
medium	96 FPS	49 FPS
high	75 FPS	36 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	26 FPS
4K
low	71 FPS	38 FPS
medium	56 FPS	25 FPS
high	43 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	30 FPS	14 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	258 FPS	263 FPS
medium	207 FPS	211 FPS
high	172 FPS	176 FPS
ultra	129 FPS	132 FPS
1440p
low	194 FPS	198 FPS
medium	155 FPS	158 FPS
high	129 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	97 FPS	99 FPS
4K
low	129 FPS	132 FPS
medium	103 FPS	105 FPS
high	86 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	66 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
1080p
low	169 FPS	172 FPS
medium	139 FPS	141 FPS
high	123 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	122 FPS	122 FPS
medium	103 FPS	101 FPS
high	91 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	71 FPS	70 FPS
4K
low	72 FPS	69 FPS
medium	57 FPS	56 FPS
high	47 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	33 FPS

Open GeForce MX570 Open Radeon Pro 5300M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce MX570

The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,738	5,853+2%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2048+60%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+48%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1250 MHz+8%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce MX570	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 109.1% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.