
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
2020Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 85W, a 35W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌70% higher power demand at 85W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) better than Radeon Pro 5300M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 5300M make more sense than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 36 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 144 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 103 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 67 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 266 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 213 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 256 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,918 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) scores 5,918 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1485 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,918+1% | 5,853 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.041 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+5% |
| Boost Clock | 1485 MHz+19% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) draws 50W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 51.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Mobile) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-41% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 118.4+72% | 68.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













