
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
2017Radeon Pro 5300M
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5300M better than GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 66 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 17 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 209 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 157 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 174 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 130 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) and Radeon Pro 5300M

GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1493 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,800 points.

Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M
The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) scores 5,800 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 2.488 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,800 | 5,853 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 1280+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.488 TFLOPS | 3.2 TFLOPS+29% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+30% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5300M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (6th Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (3rd Gen) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (móvel) | Radeon Pro 5300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.3+12% | 68.9 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













