
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 85W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Radeon Pro 5300
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 23.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 85W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Trade-offs
- ❌20% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.8 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 5300 better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS make more sense than Radeon Pro 5300?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 14 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 315 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 252 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 210 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 236 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 126 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS and Radeon Pro 5300
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.

Radeon Pro 5300
Radeon Pro 5300
The Radeon Pro 5300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1650 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,125 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS scores 7,000 and the Radeon Pro 5300 reaches 7,125 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1650 MHz.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,000 | 7,125+2% |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1280 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1650 MHz+10% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro 5300 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: ES 3.2 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | ES 3.2 | 4.6+44% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300). Decoder: Adreno VPU vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5300).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | Adreno VPU | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 5300's 85W — a 72% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-53% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 175.0+109% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS launched at $250 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5300 launched at $300. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS costs 16.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) vs 23.8 (Radeon Pro 5300) — the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS offers 17.6% better value. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS | Radeon Pro 5300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-17% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0+18% | 23.8 |
| Codename | — | Navi 14 |
| Release | October 26 2023 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #482 | #351 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












