G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro K4100M

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quadro K4100M

2013

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 100W, a 65W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌185.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro K4100M better than Radeon Pro 450?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,773 vs 2,723 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro K4100M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K4100M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro K4100M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $1,499 MSRP. Quadro K4100M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro K4100M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $1,499 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 450 is the newer 2016 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 100W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon Pro 450 make more sense than Quadro K4100M?

Yes. Radeon Pro 450 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 100W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro K4100M. The trade-off is that Quadro K4100M currently gives you 1.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K4100M Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro 450 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	80 FPS	37 FPS
medium	69 FPS	22 FPS
high	55 FPS	16 FPS
ultra	36 FPS	9 FPS
1440p
low	70 FPS	25 FPS
medium	62 FPS	15 FPS
high	44 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	4 FPS
4K
low	26 FPS	9 FPS
medium	24 FPS	6 FPS
high	16 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	14 FPS	3 FPS

Open Quadro K4100M Open Radeon Pro 450

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	80 FPS	45 FPS
medium	57 FPS	24 FPS
high	43 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	11 FPS
1440p
low	45 FPS	20 FPS
medium	29 FPS	12 FPS
high	22 FPS	8 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	6 FPS
4K
low	17 FPS	6 FPS
medium	11 FPS	4 FPS
high	9 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	6 FPS	2 FPS

Open Quadro K4100M Open Radeon Pro 450

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	125 FPS	123 FPS
medium	100 FPS	98 FPS
high	83 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	92 FPS
medium	75 FPS	74 FPS
high	62 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	61 FPS
medium	50 FPS	49 FPS
high	42 FPS	41 FPS
ultra	31 FPS	31 FPS

Open Quadro K4100M Open Radeon Pro 450

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low	125 FPS	123 FPS
medium	100 FPS	98 FPS
high	83 FPS	82 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	61 FPS
1440p
low	94 FPS	92 FPS
medium	75 FPS	74 FPS
high	62 FPS	61 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	46 FPS
4K
low	57 FPS	59 FPS
medium	43 FPS	44 FPS
high	34 FPS	35 FPS
ultra	23 FPS	25 FPS

Open Quadro K4100M Open Radeon Pro 450

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K4100M and Radeon Pro 450

Quadro K4100M

The Quadro K4100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,773 points. Launch price was $1,499.

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K4100M scores 2,773 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K4100M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro K4100M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro K4100M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score	2,773+2%	2,723
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1152+80%	640
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.627 TFLOPS+59%	1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	96+140%	40
L1 Cache	96 KB	160 KB+67%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K4100M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The Quadro K4100M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K4100M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K4100M draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 96.3% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K4100M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K4100M	Radeon Pro 450
TDP	100W	35W-65%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	27.7	77.8+181%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K4100M launched at $1499 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($1499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.8 (Quadro K4100M) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).