
GRID M10-2Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID M10-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
GRID M10-2Q
2015Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro 450 better than GRID M10-2Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID M10-2Q make more sense than Radeon Pro 450?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 86 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M10-2Q and Radeon Pro 450

GRID M10-2Q
GRID M10-2Q
The GRID M10-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,692 points.

Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M10-2Q scores 2,692 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M10-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,692 | 2,723+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+371% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+380% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M10-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the GRID M10-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M10-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M10-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.0 | 77.8+548% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M10-2Q launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($2500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.1 (GRID M10-2Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M10-2Q | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM204 | Baffin |
| Release | August 30 2015 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













