
GRID K2
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID K2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
GRID K2
2013Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GRID K2 better than Radeon Pro 450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 450 make more sense than GRID K2?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID K2 and Radeon Pro 450

GRID K2
GRID K2
The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,737 | 2,723 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 ×2+140% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.289 TFLOPS ×2+124% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 ×2+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K2) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2 | 77.8+538% |
Value Analysis
The GRID K2 launched at $5199 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($5199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GRID K2 | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.5 | Infinity |
| Codename | GK104 | Baffin |
| Release | May 11 2013 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #611 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













