GRID K2 vs Radeon Pro 450

GRID K2

2013Core: 745 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 450

2016Core: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GRID K2

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 542.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro 450

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 225W, a 190W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is GRID K2 better than Radeon Pro 450?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 2,737 vs 2,723 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GRID K2 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GRID K2 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GRID K2 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $5,199 MSRP. GRID K2 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GRID K2 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $5,199 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro 450 is the newer 2016 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (35W vs 225W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon Pro 450 make more sense than GRID K2?
Yes. Radeon Pro 450 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (35W vs 225W), and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of GRID K2. The trade-off is that GRID K2 currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low102 FPS37 FPS
medium83 FPS22 FPS
high65 FPS16 FPS
ultra38 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low85 FPS25 FPS
medium71 FPS15 FPS
high50 FPS8 FPS
ultra28 FPS4 FPS
4K
low28 FPS9 FPS
medium26 FPS6 FPS
high17 FPS4 FPS
ultra15 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low88 FPS45 FPS
medium62 FPS24 FPS
high48 FPS17 FPS
ultra32 FPS11 FPS
1440p
low48 FPS20 FPS
medium31 FPS12 FPS
high23 FPS8 FPS
ultra17 FPS6 FPS
4K
low18 FPS6 FPS
medium12 FPS4 FPS
high9 FPS3 FPS
ultra7 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low123 FPS123 FPS
medium99 FPS98 FPS
high82 FPS82 FPS
ultra62 FPS61 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS92 FPS
medium74 FPS74 FPS
high62 FPS61 FPS
ultra46 FPS46 FPS
4K
low62 FPS61 FPS
medium49 FPS49 FPS
high41 FPS41 FPS
ultra31 FPS31 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
1080p
low123 FPS123 FPS
medium99 FPS98 FPS
high82 FPS82 FPS
ultra62 FPS61 FPS
1440p
low92 FPS92 FPS
medium74 FPS74 FPS
high62 FPS61 FPS
ultra46 FPS46 FPS
4K
low62 FPS59 FPS
medium49 FPS44 FPS
high41 FPS35 FPS
ultra29 FPS25 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID K2 and Radeon Pro 450

NVIDIA

GRID K2

The GRID K2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,737 points. Launch price was $5,199.

AMD

Radeon Pro 450

The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID K2 scores 2,737 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID K2 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID K2) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K2) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).

FeatureGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
G3D Mark Score
2,737
2,723
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536 ×2+140%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.289 TFLOPS ×2+124%
1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2+100%
16
TMUs
128 ×2+220%
40
L1 Cache
128 KB
160 KB+25%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GRID K2) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID K2 draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID K2) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
TDP
225W
35W-84%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
12.2
77.8+538%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID K2 launched at $5199 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 450 launched at $0. The Radeon Pro 450 costs 100+% less ($5199 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.5 (GRID K2) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGRID K2Radeon Pro 450
MSRP
$5199
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.5
Infinity
Codename
GK104
Baffin
Release
May 11 2013
October 30 2016
Ranking
#611
#612