
GeForce GTX 770M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 770M
2013Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 770M
2013Radeon Pro 450
2016Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 75W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 75W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 770M better than Radeon Pro 450?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro 450 make more sense than GeForce GTX 770M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 94 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770M and Radeon Pro 450

GeForce GTX 770M
GeForce GTX 770M
The GeForce GTX 770M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 811 MHz to 797 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,784 points. Launch price was $189.99.

Radeon Pro 450
Radeon Pro 450
The Radeon Pro 450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,723 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770M scores 2,784 and the Radeon Pro 450 reaches 2,723 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 450 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 960 (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 640 (Radeon Pro 450). Raw compute: 1.53 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1.024 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 450).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,784+2% | 2,723 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 960+50% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.53 TFLOPS+49% | 1.024 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+50% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 160 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 450 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 450 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 770M offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.38 MB (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 450) — the Radeon Pro 450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 12_0 (Radeon Pro 450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 770M) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 450). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP5 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770M draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 450's 35W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 770M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 450). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 35W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 37.1 | 77.8+110% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro 450 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770M | Radeon Pro 450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK106 | Baffin |
| Release | May 30 2013 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #603 | #612 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












