
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅+49.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,638 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2023Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅+49.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 300W, a 140W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,638 vs 17,400).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon Instinct MI60?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Instinct MI60 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 162 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 142 FPS | 129 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 93 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 30 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 280 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 223 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 261 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 217 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 180 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 783 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 392 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 775 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 626 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 522 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 392 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 587 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 392 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 294 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 374 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 313 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 261 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU and Radeon Instinct MI60

GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,400 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU scores 17,400 versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 11,638 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU leads by 49.5%. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 2535 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,400+50% | 11,638 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4352+6% | 4096 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 22.06 TFLOPS+50% | 14.75 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz+41% | 1800 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 136 | 256+88% |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB+330% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Instinct MI60 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Instinct MI60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (8th Gen) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU draws 160W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-47% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 500W-23% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 108.8+180% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6000 |
| Codename | AD106 | Vega 20 |
| Release | May 18 2023 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #59 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












