
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
2017Radeon Instinct MI60
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 300W, a 150W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅15.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Instinct MI60 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 300W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Instinct MI60 better than GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 122 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 73 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 316 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 214 FPS |
| medium | 144 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 520 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 416 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 390 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 312 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 208 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 173 FPS | 175 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 316 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 276 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 189 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 222 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 171 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 139 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design and Radeon Instinct MI60

GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1290 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,566 points.

Radeon Instinct MI60
Radeon Instinct MI60
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2018. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,638 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design scores 11,566 and the Radeon Instinct MI60 reaches 11,638 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is built on Pascal while the Radeon Instinct MI60 uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Raw compute: 7.516 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Instinct MI60). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,566 | 11,638 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.516 TFLOPS | 14.75 TFLOPS+96% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | 1800 MHz+23% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 160 | 256+60% |
| L1 Cache | 0.94 MB | 1 MB+6% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Instinct MI60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI60) — the Radeon Instinct MI60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 12.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Instinct MI60). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Instinct MI60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design draws 150W versus the Radeon Instinct MI60's 300W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon Instinct MI60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-50% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1+99% | 38.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI60 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 with Max-Q Design | Radeon Instinct MI60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $6000 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | June 27 2017 | November 18 2018 |
| Ranking | #257 | #232 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












