Quadro M2200 vs Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

2017Core: 695 MHzBoost: 1036 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017Core: 1400 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro M2200

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

2017

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU better than Quadro M2200?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 4,294 vs 4,403 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M2200 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 2 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 2.5% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M2200 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does Quadro M2200 make more sense than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Yes. Quadro M2200 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (55W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark. Quadro M2200 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low78 FPS139 FPS
medium66 FPS129 FPS
high53 FPS106 FPS
ultra35 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low68 FPS118 FPS
medium59 FPS102 FPS
high41 FPS82 FPS
ultra26 FPS64 FPS
4K
low24 FPS55 FPS
medium23 FPS48 FPS
high15 FPS38 FPS
ultra13 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low79 FPS198 FPS
medium56 FPS159 FPS
high44 FPS132 FPS
ultra27 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low45 FPS137 FPS
medium29 FPS111 FPS
high22 FPS92 FPS
ultra15 FPS70 FPS
4K
low17 FPS60 FPS
medium11 FPS50 FPS
high9 FPS48 FPS
ultra6 FPS40 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low193 FPS198 FPS
medium155 FPS159 FPS
high129 FPS132 FPS
ultra97 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS149 FPS
medium116 FPS119 FPS
high97 FPS99 FPS
ultra72 FPS74 FPS
4K
low97 FPS99 FPS
medium77 FPS79 FPS
high64 FPS66 FPS
ultra48 FPS50 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
1080p
low143 FPS198 FPS
medium112 FPS159 FPS
high95 FPS132 FPS
ultra78 FPS99 FPS
1440p
low103 FPS149 FPS
medium84 FPS119 FPS
high71 FPS99 FPS
ultra57 FPS74 FPS
4K
low61 FPS99 FPS
medium46 FPS79 FPS
high36 FPS66 FPS
ultra27 FPS50 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

NVIDIA

Quadro M2200

The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

AMD

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score
4,294
4,403+3%
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1024
4096 ×2+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.122 TFLOPS
12.29 TFLOPS ×2+479%
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1500 MHz+45%
ROPs
32
64 ×2+100%
TMUs
64
256 ×2+300%
L1 Cache
0.38 MB
1 MB+163%
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 2 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
4 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 138% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M2200Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
TDP
55W-82%
300W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
78.1+431%
14.7