
Quadro M2200
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M2200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Quadro M2200
2017Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 8.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU better than Quadro M2200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro M2200 make more sense than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 79 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 22 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 112 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 84 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M2200 and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
The Quadro M2200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 695 MHz to 1036 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,294 points.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M2200 scores 4,294 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2200 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro M2200) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.122 TFLOPS (Quadro M2200) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1036 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,294 | 4,403+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 4096 ×2+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.122 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+479% |
| Boost Clock | 1036 MHz | 1500 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 256 ×2+300% |
| L1 Cache | 0.38 MB | 1 MB+163% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M2200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 2 GB. The Quadro M2200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro M2200) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M2200 draws 55W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 138% difference. The Quadro M2200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2200) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M2200 | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-82% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 78.1+431% | 14.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












