
GRID P6-4Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID P6-4Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
GRID P6-4Q
2015Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Quick Answers
So, is GRID P6-4Q better than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU make more sense than GRID P6-4Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 102 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 55 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 199 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 159 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 120 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 50 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 98 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 50 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-4Q and Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

GRID P6-4Q
GRID P6-4Q
The GRID P6-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,429 points.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,403 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-4Q scores 4,429 and the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU reaches 4,403 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-4Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID P6-4Q) vs 4,096 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P6-4Q) vs 12.29 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,429 | 4,403 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 4096 ×2+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS ×2+454% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 96 | 256 ×2+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.56 MB | 1 MB+79% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-4Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU) — the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-4Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU's 300W — a 100% difference. The GRID P6-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-4Q) vs 350W (Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 44.3+201% | 14.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P6-4Q | Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Vega 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 27 2017 |
| Ranking | #535 | #474 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













