
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 305mm, a 304mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅53.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
2011Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $849 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 574.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.6 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 375W, a 325W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 305mm, a 304mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅53.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 37.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌650% higher power demand at 375W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7990 better than Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire make more sense than Radeon HD 7990?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 12 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 254 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 203 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 169 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 190 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 152 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 35 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire and Radeon HD 7990

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire scores 5,637 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is built on Terascale 2 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,637+1% | 5,566 |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2048 ×2+7% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 115.2 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7990) — a 2401.3% advantage for the Radeon HD 7990. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 384-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s x2 | 288 GB/s x2+150% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 384-bit x2+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11_0 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11_0 | 12 (11_1)+9% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 3 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: UVD 3 vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 3 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 305mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-87% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 112.7+661% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire costs 85% less ($849 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.6 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire offers 571.4% better value. The Radeon HD 7990 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-85% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.6+571% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Blackcomb XT | Malta |
| Release | January 6 2011 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #537 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













