
Quadro M3000M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro M3000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.
Quadro M3000M
2015Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 375W, a 300W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅16.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7990 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 375W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro M3000M better than Radeon HD 7990?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 251 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 201 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 167 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 188 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 114 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 95 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 52 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M3000M and Radeon HD 7990

Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M3000M scores 5,574 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M3000M is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1 (Quadro M3000M) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,574 | 5,566 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1,024 | 2048 ×2+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.15 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+91% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M3000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The Quadro M3000M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M3000M) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Quadro M3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit x2+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 133.3% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M3000M) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-80% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 74.3+402% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M3000M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro M3000M | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Codename | GM204 | Malta |
| Release | August 18 2015 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #411 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













