
GeForce GTX 690
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 690
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 375W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 375W vs 300W.
GeForce GTX 690
2012Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 300W instead of 375W, a 75W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (3 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 3 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌25% higher power demand at 375W vs 300W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7990 better than GeForce GTX 690?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 690 make more sense than Radeon HD 7990?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 125 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 94 FPS |
| ultra | 50 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 75 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 34 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon HD 7990

GeForce GTX 690
GeForce GTX 690
The GeForce GTX 690 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 3 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 3072 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,536 points. Launch price was $999.

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 690 scores 5,536 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 690 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990). Boost clocks: 1019 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,536 | 5,566 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 ×2+50% | 2048 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.13 TFLOPS ×2 | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1019 MHz+2% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 ×2 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 128 ×2 | 128 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 690 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7990 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 690 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The Radeon HD 7990 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s x2 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 288 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 7990) — a 1399.3% advantage for the Radeon HD 7990. Bus width: 256-bit x2 vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 690) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 3 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s x2 | 288 GB/s x2+50% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit x2 | 384-bit x2+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12 (11_1) |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 690) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: VP5 vs UVD 3.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VP5 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 690 draws 300W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 690 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 690) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 279mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-20% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 279mm | 305mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.5+25% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 690 launched at $999 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (GeForce GTX 690) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 offers 1.8% better value. The Radeon HD 7990 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 690 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.5 | 5.6+2% |
| Codename | GK104 | Malta |
| Release | May 3 2012 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #414 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












