FirePro D300 vs Radeon HD 7990

FirePro D300

2014Core: 850 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7990

2013Core: 950 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro D300

2014

Why buy it

  • Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
  • Measures 242mm instead of 305mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Radeon HD 7990

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 99.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro D300 better than Radeon HD 7990?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,722 vs 5,566 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro D300 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (150W vs 375W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro D300 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013, more VRAM at 4 GB instead of 3 GB, and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro D300 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. FirePro D300 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro D300 is about $499 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $999 MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $500 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (150W vs 375W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is Radeon HD 7990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Radeon HD 7990 is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $999 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. FirePro D300 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
1080p
low103 FPS77 FPS
medium88 FPS63 FPS
high71 FPS50 FPS
ultra42 FPS33 FPS
1440p
low90 FPS65 FPS
medium77 FPS54 FPS
high56 FPS38 FPS
ultra32 FPS24 FPS
4K
low28 FPS24 FPS
medium27 FPS23 FPS
high18 FPS14 FPS
ultra15 FPS12 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
1080p
low158 FPS143 FPS
medium118 FPS118 FPS
high85 FPS97 FPS
ultra57 FPS71 FPS
1440p
low106 FPS88 FPS
medium74 FPS66 FPS
high56 FPS49 FPS
ultra40 FPS37 FPS
4K
low52 FPS37 FPS
medium37 FPS28 FPS
high30 FPS21 FPS
ultra20 FPS16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
1080p
low257 FPS250 FPS
medium206 FPS200 FPS
high172 FPS167 FPS
ultra129 FPS125 FPS
1440p
low193 FPS188 FPS
medium154 FPS150 FPS
high129 FPS125 FPS
ultra97 FPS94 FPS
4K
low129 FPS125 FPS
medium103 FPS100 FPS
high86 FPS83 FPS
ultra64 FPS63 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
1080p
low180 FPS145 FPS
medium146 FPS116 FPS
high128 FPS100 FPS
ultra99 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low126 FPS107 FPS
medium104 FPS87 FPS
high92 FPS75 FPS
ultra67 FPS58 FPS
4K
low73 FPS63 FPS
medium56 FPS48 FPS
high45 FPS38 FPS
ultra31 FPS26 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and Radeon HD 7990

AMD

FirePro D300

The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7990

The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
G3D Mark Score
5,722+3%
5,566
Architecture
GCN 1.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1280
2048 ×2+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.176 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS ×2+88%
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
80
128 ×2+60%
L1 Cache
320 KB
512 KB+60%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The FirePro D300 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro D300) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit
384-bit x2+200%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
DirectX
12
12 (11_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
6+20%
5
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
Encoder
VCE 1.0
VCE 1.0
Decoder
UVD 4.0
UVD 3.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
TDP
150W-60%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W-53%
750W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 8-pin
Length
242mm
305mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
38.1+157%
14.8
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999. The FirePro D300 costs 49.9% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the FirePro D300 offers 103.6% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureFirePro D300Radeon HD 7990
MSRP
$500-50%
$999
Performance per Dollar
11.4+104%
5.6
Codename
Pitcairn
Malta
Release
January 18 2014
April 24 2013
Ranking
#506
#412