
FirePro D300
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7990
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro D300
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 305mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
FirePro D300
2014Radeon HD 7990
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $499 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 105.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.4 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 375W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 305mm, a 63mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌99.8% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 375W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro D300 better than Radeon HD 7990?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7990 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 52 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 63 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 146 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro D300 and Radeon HD 7990

FirePro D300
FirePro D300
The FirePro D300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,722 points.

Radeon HD 7990
Radeon HD 7990
The Radeon HD 7990 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 950 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,566 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro D300 scores 5,722 and the Radeon HD 7990 reaches 5,566 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro D300 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7990 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (FirePro D300) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7990). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (FirePro D300) vs 4.096 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,722+3% | 5,566 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 2048 ×2+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.176 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS ×2+88% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 ×2 |
| TMUs | 80 | 128 ×2+60% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 512 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro D300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7990 has 3 GB. The FirePro D300 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit x2. L2 Cache: 512 KB (FirePro D300) vs 768 KB (Radeon HD 7990) — the Radeon HD 7990 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit x2+200% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FirePro D300) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7990). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 5.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+20% | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (FirePro D300) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7990). Decoder: UVD 4.0 vs UVD 3.2. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro D300) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7990).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 4.0 | UVD 3.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro D300 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 7990's 375W — a 85.7% difference. The FirePro D300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro D300) vs 750W (Radeon HD 7990). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 305mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-60% | 375W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-53% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 305mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 38.1+157% | 14.8 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro D300 launched at $500 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7990 launched at $999. The FirePro D300 costs 49.9% less ($499 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.4 (FirePro D300) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 7990) — the FirePro D300 offers 103.6% better value. The FirePro D300 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | FirePro D300 | Radeon HD 7990 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500-50% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.4+104% | 5.6 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Malta |
| Release | January 18 2014 | April 24 2013 |
| Ranking | #506 | #412 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













