
Radeon HD 5830
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon HD 5830
2010Why buy it
- ✅82.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌119.3% HIGHER MSRP$239 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌218.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 55W.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 116.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 175W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 280mm, a 112mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5830 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon HD 5830
2010Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅82.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $130 less on MSRP ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 116.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs $239 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 175W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 280mm, a 112mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌119.3% HIGHER MSRP$239 MSRPvs$109 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.2 vs 15.6 G3D/$ ($239 MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌218.2% higher power demand at 175W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5830 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 5830 better than Radeon HD 7750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon HD 7750 make more sense than Radeon HD 5830?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 23 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5830 and Radeon HD 7750

Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830
The Radeon HD 5830 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 25 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5830 scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5830 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,120 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5830) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+1% | 1,703 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1120+119% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.792 TFLOPS+119% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 56+75% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 128 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5830 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon HD 5830) vs 72 GB/s (Radeon HD 7750) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon HD 5830. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5830) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 5830 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 4 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s+78% | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12 (FL 11_1)+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5830 draws 175W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 104.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 5830) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 280mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 55W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 280mm | 168mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.9 | 31.0+213% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5830 launched at $239 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 7750 launched at $109. The Radeon HD 7750 costs 54.4% less ($130 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon HD 5830) vs 15.6 (Radeon HD 7750) — the Radeon HD 7750 offers 116.7% better value. The Radeon HD 7750 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5830 | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $239 | $109-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 15.6+117% |
| Codename | Cypress | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 25 2010 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #724 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













