
Quadro 5010M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro 5010M
2011Why buy it
- ✅93.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5010M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quadro 5010M
2011Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅93.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 100W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
- ❌81.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro 5010M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 7750 better than Quadro 5010M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Quadro 5010M make more sense than Radeon HD 7750?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 21 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 46 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 51 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 5010M and Radeon HD 7750

Quadro 5010M
Quadro 5010M
The Quadro 5010M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 450 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,691 points.

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 5010M scores 1,691 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 5010M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro 5010M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Quadro 5010M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,691 | 1,703 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+19% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+500% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro 5010M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750) — the Quadro 5010M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 5010M draws 100W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 5010M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 55W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 31.0+83% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7750 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro 5010M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Codename | GF110 | Cape Verde |
| Release | February 22 2011 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #733 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













