
GeForce GTX 760M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 760M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GTX 760M
2013Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 760M better than Radeon HD 7750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 20 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 14 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760M and Radeon HD 7750

GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GTX 760M
The GeForce GTX 760M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 657 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760M scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750). Boost clocks: 657 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+1% | 1,703 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.009 TFLOPS+23% | 0.8192 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | 800 MHz+22% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 64 KB | 128 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 72 GB/s (Radeon HD 7750) — a 11.1% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760M. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s+11% | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760M draws 55W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 760M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+1% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 760M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Codename | GK106 | Cape Verde |
| Release | May 30 2013 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #725 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













