GeForce GTX 670M vs Radeon HD 7750

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

2012Core: 598 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7750

2012Boost: 800 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 670M

2012

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
  • 36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Radeon HD 7750

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
  • Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 670M better than Radeon HD 7750?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,714 vs 1,703 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 670M is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 670M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
GeForce GTX 670M is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 670M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $109 MSRP, and you are getting 0.6% higher G3D Mark. Radeon HD 7750 really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
Is Radeon HD 7750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
No, not for a fresh gaming build. Radeon HD 7750 is 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 1,703 in G3D Mark, and FSR upscaling. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
1080p
low17 FPS19 FPS
medium10 FPS12 FPS
high6 FPS8 FPS
ultra4 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low8 FPS12 FPS
medium4 FPS6 FPS
high2 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS2 FPS
4K
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium2 FPS3 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
1080p
low44 FPS54 FPS
medium25 FPS28 FPS
high19 FPS20 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
1440p
low22 FPS17 FPS
medium13 FPS10 FPS
high8 FPS7 FPS
ultra7 FPS5 FPS
4K
low8 FPS5 FPS
medium5 FPS3 FPS
high4 FPS2 FPS
ultra3 FPS2 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
1080p
low77 FPS77 FPS
medium62 FPS61 FPS
high51 FPS51 FPS
ultra39 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low58 FPS57 FPS
medium46 FPS46 FPS
high39 FPS38 FPS
ultra29 FPS29 FPS
4K
low39 FPS38 FPS
medium31 FPS31 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
1080p
low67 FPS77 FPS
medium54 FPS61 FPS
high38 FPS51 FPS
ultra29 FPS38 FPS
1440p
low9 FPS57 FPS
medium7 FPS45 FPS
high6 FPS37 FPS
ultra5 FPS26 FPS
4K
low6 FPS31 FPS
medium4 FPS23 FPS
high4 FPS19 FPS
ultra3 FPS13 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 670M and Radeon HD 7750

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670M

The GeForce GTX 670M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 598 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,714 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7750

The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670M scores 1,714 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670M is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.8037 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
G3D Mark Score
1,714
1,703
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
336
512+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8037 TFLOPS
0.8192 TFLOPS+2%
ROPs
24+50%
16
TMUs
56+75%
32
L1 Cache
448 KB+250%
128 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 670M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 7750) — the GeForce GTX 670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
72 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
384 KB+50%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL 11_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GTX 670M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 670M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
Encoder
No NVENC (Fermi)
VCE 1.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
UVD 3.1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670M draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 30.8% difference. The Radeon HD 7750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 670M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670MRadeon HD 7750
TDP
75W
55W-27%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
60°C-20%
Perf/Watt
22.9
31.0+35%