
GeForce GT 755M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GT 755M
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce GT 755M
2013Radeon HD 7750
2012Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2012-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GT 755M better than Radeon HD 7750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 7750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 32 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 44 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 31 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 13 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 755M and Radeon HD 7750

GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
The GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,726 points.

Radeon HD 7750
Radeon HD 7750
The Radeon HD 7750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 15 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,703 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 755M scores 1,726 and the Radeon HD 7750 reaches 1,703 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 7750 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 755M) vs 512 (Radeon HD 7750). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 755M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,726+1% | 1,703 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+9% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 755M gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon HD 7750 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 755M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7750 has 4 GB. The Radeon HD 7750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 72 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M) vs 12 (FL 11_1) (Radeon HD 7750). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL 11_1) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GT 755M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7750). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs UVD 3.1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7750).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP5) | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 755M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 7750's 55W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 755M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M) vs 300W (Radeon HD 7750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 60°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-9% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 60°C-25% |
| Perf/Watt | 34.5+11% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 755M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 7750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $109 |
| Codename | GK107 | Cape Verde |
| Release | June 25 2013 | February 15 2012 |
| Ranking | #726 | #731 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













