
NVS 810
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
NVS 810
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 86W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌438.5% HIGHER MSRP$700 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌26.5% higher power demand at 86W vs 68W.
NVS 810
2015Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅Draws 68W instead of 86W, a 18W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $570 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 428.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $700 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌438.5% HIGHER MSRP$700 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($700 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌26.5% higher power demand at 86W vs 68W.
Quick Answers
So, is NVS 810 better than Radeon HD 5750?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon HD 5750 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 40 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 28 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 10 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 40 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 27 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 810 and Radeon HD 5750

NVS 810
NVS 810
The NVS 810 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,192 points.

Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 810 scores 1,192 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 810 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 810) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 810) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,192+2% | 1,169 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 720+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.058 TFLOPS ×2+5% | 1.008 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 ×2 | 36+13% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+256% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 810 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The NVS 810 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 810) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 5750) — the NVS 810 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (NVS 810) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5 | — |
| Decoder | NVDEC 2 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 810 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 23.4% difference. The NVS 810 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 810) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W-21% | 86W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 198mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+29% | 13.6 |
Value Analysis
The NVS 810 launched at $700 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 81.4% less ($570 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (NVS 810) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 429.4% better value. The NVS 810 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | NVS 810 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $700 | $130-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 9.0+429% |
| Codename | GM107 | Juniper |
| Release | November 4 2015 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #826 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













