Firepro W4190M vs Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M

2015Core: 825 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon HD 5750

2009Core: 700 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Firepro W4190M

2015

Why buy it

  • Draws 30W instead of 86W, a 56W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon HD 5750

2009

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 186.7% higher power demand at 86W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon HD 5750 better than Firepro W4190M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 1,168 vs 1,169 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon HD 5750 is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Firepro W4190M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2015 generation instead of 2009, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 28nm process instead of 40nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon HD 5750 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $130 MSRP. Radeon HD 5750 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon HD 5750 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $130 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.1% higher G3D Mark. Firepro W4190M is the newer 2015 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (30W vs 86W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Firepro W4190M make more sense than Radeon HD 5750?
Yes. Firepro W4190M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (30W vs 86W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon HD 5750. The trade-off is that Radeon HD 5750 currently gives you 0.1% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
1080p
low15 FPS16 FPS
medium9 FPS10 FPS
high5 FPS6 FPS
ultra3 FPS3 FPS
1440p
low9 FPS11 FPS
medium5 FPS6 FPS
high2 FPS3 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
4K
low4 FPS4 FPS
medium2 FPS2 FPS
high1 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
1080p
low53 FPS23 FPS
medium29 FPS10 FPS
high20 FPS7 FPS
ultra14 FPS5 FPS
1440p
low16 FPS7 FPS
medium9 FPS3 FPS
high6 FPS2 FPS
ultra5 FPS2 FPS
4K
low5 FPS2 FPS
medium3 FPS1 FPS
high2 FPS1 FPS
ultra2 FPS1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
1080p
low53 FPS53 FPS
medium42 FPS42 FPS
high35 FPS35 FPS
ultra26 FPS26 FPS
1440p
low39 FPS39 FPS
medium32 FPS32 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra20 FPS20 FPS
4K
low26 FPS26 FPS
medium21 FPS21 FPS
high18 FPS18 FPS
ultra13 FPS13 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
1080p
low41 FPS53 FPS
medium33 FPS42 FPS
high19 FPS35 FPS
ultra13 FPS23 FPS
1440p
low5 FPS33 FPS
medium3 FPS24 FPS
high3 FPS18 FPS
ultra2 FPS12 FPS
4K
low3 FPS19 FPS
medium2 FPS13 FPS
high2 FPS10 FPS
ultra1 FPS7 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Firepro W4190M and Radeon HD 5750

Firepro W4190M

The Firepro W4190M is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 5750

The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.

Graphics Performance

The Firepro W4190M scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Firepro W4190M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Firepro W4190M) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (Firepro W4190M) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
G3D Mark Score
1,168
1,169
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
720+88%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6912 TFLOPS
1.008 TFLOPS+46%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
36+50%
L1 Cache
96 KB+33%
72 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Firepro W4190M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 5750 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Firepro W4190M) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
Encoder
UVD4
Decoder
VCE1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Firepro W4190M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 96.6% difference. The Firepro W4190M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Firepro W4190M) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
TDP
30W-65%
86W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
38.9+186%
13.6
💰

Value Analysis

The Firepro W4190M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).

FeatureFirepro W4190MRadeon HD 5750
MSRP
$130
Codename
Opal
Juniper
Release
November 12 2015
October 13 2009
Ranking
#836
#834