
FirePro M4170
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro M4170
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌53.8% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ❌74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.
Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
FirePro M4170
2015Radeon HD 5750
2009Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 54% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 86W instead of 150W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌53.8% HIGHER MSRP$200 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ❌74.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 86W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2009-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon HD 5750 better than FirePro M4170?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does FirePro M4170 make more sense than Radeon HD 5750?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 18 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 10 FPS |
| high | 23 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 2 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 32 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 42 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 29 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro M4170 and Radeon HD 5750

FirePro M4170
FirePro M4170
The FirePro M4170 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 23 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 825 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,168 points.

Radeon HD 5750
Radeon HD 5750
The Radeon HD 5750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 720 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 86W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,169 points.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro M4170 scores 1,168 and the Radeon HD 5750 reaches 1,169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro M4170 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 5750 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (FirePro M4170) vs 720 (Radeon HD 5750). Raw compute: 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M4170) vs 1.008 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,168 | 1,169 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 720+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6912 TFLOPS | 1.008 TFLOPS+46% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 36+50% |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB+33% | 72 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro M4170 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 5750 has 1 GB. The FirePro M4170 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+300% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro M4170) vs H.264 (Radeon HD 5750).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | UVD | — |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro M4170 draws 150W versus the Radeon HD 5750's 86W — a 54.2% difference. The Radeon HD 5750 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro M4170) vs 450W (Radeon HD 5750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 86W-43% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.8 | 13.6+74% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro M4170 launched at $200 MSRP, while the Radeon HD 5750 launched at $130. The Radeon HD 5750 costs 35% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.8 (FirePro M4170) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 5750) — the Radeon HD 5750 offers 55.2% better value. The FirePro M4170 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | FirePro M4170 | Radeon HD 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | $130-35% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.8 | 9.0+55% |
| Codename | Opal | Juniper |
| Release | April 23 2015 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #838 | #834 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













