
HD Graphics 520
Popular choices:

Radeon E6760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
HD Graphics 520
2015Why buy it
- β Costs $140 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- β Delivers 143.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 520: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β140% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
HD Graphics 520
2015Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- β Costs $140 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- β Delivers 143.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.6 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- β Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Why buy it
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- β Less risky long-term buy than HD Graphics 520: it remains the more sensible modern option while HD Graphics 520 is already obsolete for modern gaming.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- β140% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 8.6 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is HD Graphics 520 better than Radeon E6760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon E6760 make more sense than HD Graphics 520?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 14 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 4 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 10 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and Radeon E6760

HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm+ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 861+1% | 850 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 480+150% |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 has 512 MB. The Radeon E6760 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W β a 100% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-67% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Perf/Watt | 57.4+204% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The HD Graphics 520 costs 58.3% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) β the HD Graphics 520 offers 145.7% better value. The HD Graphics 520 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-58% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.6+146% | 3.5 |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | Turks |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #929 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











