
GRID M60-0Q
Popular choices:

Radeon E6760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID M60-0Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GRID M60-0Q
2015Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 225W, a 180W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌400% higher power demand at 225W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon E6760 better than GRID M60-0Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GRID M60-0Q make more sense than Radeon E6760?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-0Q and Radeon E6760

GRID M60-0Q
GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-0Q scores 827 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-0Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 827 | 850+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| ROPs | 64+700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-0Q draws 225W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-0Q) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 45W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.7 | 18.9+411% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-0Q launched at $0 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The GRID M60-0Q costs 100+% less ($240 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID M60-0Q) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the GRID M60-0Q offers Infinity% better value. The GRID M60-0Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID M60-0Q | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 3.5 |
| Codename | GM204 | Turks |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #433 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












