
GeForce 920A
Popular choices:

Radeon E6760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce 920A
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 134.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 45W, a 12W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌140% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 33W.
GeForce 920A
2015Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 134.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.3 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 45W, a 12W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌140% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 8.3 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌36.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon E6760 better than GeForce 920A?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce 920A make more sense than Radeon E6760?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 16 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 16 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 22 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 8 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 8 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 6 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 10 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 920A and Radeon E6760

GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
The GeForce 920A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 928 MHz to 941 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 829 points.

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 920A scores 829 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 920A is built on Maxwell while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 920A) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 829 | 850+3% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 920A gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon E6760 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 920A draws 33W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 920A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 920A) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-27% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.1+33% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920A launched at $100 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The GeForce 920A costs 58.3% less ($140 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.3 (GeForce 920A) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the GeForce 920A offers 137.1% better value. The GeForce 920A is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GeForce 920A | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-58% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.3+137% | 3.5 |
| Codename | GM108 | Turks |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #810 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












