
FirePro W2100
Popular choices:

Radeon E6760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro W2100
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 45W, a 19W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌72.7% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 45W vs 26W.
FirePro W2100
2014Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($139 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 72.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.1 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($139 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅Draws 26W instead of 45W, a 19W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌72.7% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$139 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 6.1 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $139 MSRP).
- ❌73.1% higher power demand at 45W vs 26W.
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro W2100 better than Radeon E6760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon E6760 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 13 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 9 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 5 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 6 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 10 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro W2100 and Radeon E6760

FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100
The FirePro W2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 12 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 630 MHz to 680 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 26W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 851 points.

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro W2100 scores 851 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W2100 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 320 (FirePro W2100) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 851 | 850 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 320 | 480+50% |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro W2100 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 has 512 MB. The FirePro W2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro W2100 draws 26W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 53.5% difference. The FirePro W2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W2100) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 26W-42% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.7+73% | 18.9 |
Value Analysis
The FirePro W2100 launched at $139 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The FirePro W2100 costs 42.1% less ($101 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.1 (FirePro W2100) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the FirePro W2100 offers 74.3% better value. The FirePro W2100 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).
| Feature | FirePro W2100 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $139-42% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.1+74% | 3.5 |
| Codename | Oland | Turks |
| Release | August 12 2014 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #910 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











