FirePro 3D V4800 vs Radeon E6760

FirePro 3D V4800

2010Core: 690 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon E6760

2011Core: 600 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

FirePro 3D V4800

2010

Why buy it

  • Costs $51 less on MSRP ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 64.4% higher power demand at 74W vs 45W.

Radeon E6760

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 74W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
  • 27% HIGHER MSRP
    $240 MSRPvs$189 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is FirePro 3D V4800 better than Radeon E6760?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 854 vs 850 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer FirePro 3D V4800 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro 3D V4800 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 1 GB instead of 512 MB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
FirePro 3D V4800 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $189 MSRP. FirePro 3D V4800 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. FirePro 3D V4800 is about $51 cheaper on MSRP at $189 MSRP versus $240 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon E6760 is the newer 2011 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture and lower power draw (45W vs 74W) than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon E6760 make more sense than FirePro 3D V4800?
Yes. Radeon E6760 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (45W vs 74W), and staying closer to $240 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of FirePro 3D V4800. The trade-off is that FirePro 3D V4800 currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.6%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
1080p
low20 FPS19 FPS
medium12 FPS12 FPS
high8 FPS7 FPS
ultra4 FPS4 FPS
1440p
low14 FPS13 FPS
medium7 FPS7 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra2 FPS2 FPS
4K
low5 FPS5 FPS
medium3 FPS3 FPS
high2 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
1080p
low24 FPS29 FPS
medium10 FPS13 FPS
high8 FPS9 FPS
ultra6 FPS6 FPS
1440p
low11 FPS9 FPS
medium5 FPS4 FPS
high3 FPS3 FPS
ultra3 FPS2 FPS
4K
low4 FPS3 FPS
medium2 FPS1 FPS
high2 FPS1 FPS
ultra1 FPS1 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
1080p
low38 FPS38 FPS
medium31 FPS31 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium23 FPS23 FPS
high19 FPS19 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
4K
low19 FPS19 FPS
medium15 FPS15 FPS
high13 FPS13 FPS
ultra10 FPS10 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
1080p
low38 FPS38 FPS
medium31 FPS31 FPS
high26 FPS26 FPS
ultra19 FPS19 FPS
1440p
low29 FPS29 FPS
medium23 FPS23 FPS
high19 FPS19 FPS
ultra14 FPS14 FPS
4K
low19 FPS19 FPS
medium15 FPS15 FPS
high13 FPS13 FPS
ultra8 FPS10 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon E6760

AMD

FirePro 3D V4800

The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

AMD

Radeon E6760

The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
G3D Mark Score
854
850
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TeraScale 2
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800+67%
480
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 48.7% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
TDP
74W
45W-39%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
11.5
18.9+64%
💰

Value Analysis

The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The FirePro 3D V4800 costs 21.3% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the FirePro 3D V4800 offers 28.6% better value. The Radeon E6760 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro 3D V4800Radeon E6760
MSRP
$189-21%
$240
Performance per Dollar
4.5+29%
3.5
Codename
Juniper
Turks
Release
April 26 2010
May 2 2011
Ranking
#780
#923