
FirePro 3D V4800
Popular choices:

Radeon E6760
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌64.4% higher power demand at 74W vs 45W.
Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 74W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$189 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
FirePro 3D V4800
2010Radeon E6760
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $51 less on MSRP ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.5 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($189 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 74W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌64.4% higher power demand at 74W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2011-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌27% HIGHER MSRP$240 MSRPvs$189 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 4.5 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $189 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is FirePro 3D V4800 better than Radeon E6760?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon E6760 make more sense than FirePro 3D V4800?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 20 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 12 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 8 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 3 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| medium | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 10 FPS | 10 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 31 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 29 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 19 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 15 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 10 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FirePro 3D V4800 and Radeon E6760

FirePro 3D V4800
FirePro 3D V4800
The FirePro 3D V4800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 854 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon E6760
Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.
Graphics Performance
The FirePro 3D V4800 scores 854 and the Radeon E6760 reaches 850 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro 3D V4800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon E6760 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 480 (Radeon E6760).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 854 | 850 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+67% | 480 |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The FirePro 3D V4800 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6760 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V4800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The FirePro 3D V4800 draws 74W versus the Radeon E6760's 45W — a 48.7% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 300W (Radeon E6760). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 74W | 45W-39% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.5 | 18.9+64% |
Value Analysis
The FirePro 3D V4800 launched at $189 MSRP, while the Radeon E6760 launched at $240. The FirePro 3D V4800 costs 21.3% less ($51 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.5 (FirePro 3D V4800) vs 3.5 (Radeon E6760) — the FirePro 3D V4800 offers 28.6% better value. The Radeon E6760 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | FirePro 3D V4800 | Radeon E6760 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $189-21% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.5+29% | 3.5 |
| Codename | Juniper | Turks |
| Release | April 26 2010 | May 2 2011 |
| Ranking | #780 | #923 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











