GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) vs Radeon 890M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

2023Core: 1545 MHzBoost: 1890 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 890M

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

2023

Why buy it

  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.

Radeon 890M

2024

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 890M better than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 8,160 vs 8,175 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon 890M is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (15W vs 115W).
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 6 GB instead of 4 GB and the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 890M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon 890M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 890M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is the more forward-looking alternative, so it still has a real case if you care more about future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) make more sense than Radeon 890M?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon 890M. The trade-off is that Radeon 890M currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
1080p
low132 FPS117 FPS
medium119 FPS99 FPS
high102 FPS82 FPS
ultra77 FPS49 FPS
1440p
low120 FPS101 FPS
medium104 FPS86 FPS
high87 FPS63 FPS
ultra66 FPS37 FPS
4K
low54 FPS34 FPS
medium50 FPS32 FPS
high38 FPS21 FPS
ultra34 FPS19 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
1080p
low220 FPS128 FPS
medium185 FPS90 FPS
high155 FPS64 FPS
ultra115 FPS46 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS91 FPS
medium107 FPS60 FPS
high88 FPS44 FPS
ultra66 FPS32 FPS
4K
low63 FPS39 FPS
medium51 FPS28 FPS
high48 FPS22 FPS
ultra39 FPS16 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
1080p
low367 FPS360 FPS
medium294 FPS294 FPS
high245 FPS245 FPS
ultra184 FPS184 FPS
1440p
low275 FPS272 FPS
medium220 FPS221 FPS
high184 FPS184 FPS
ultra138 FPS138 FPS
4K
low184 FPS170 FPS
medium147 FPS147 FPS
high122 FPS109 FPS
ultra92 FPS79 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
1080p
low367 FPS215 FPS
medium294 FPS171 FPS
high245 FPS147 FPS
ultra184 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low275 FPS142 FPS
medium220 FPS118 FPS
high184 FPS101 FPS
ultra138 FPS75 FPS
4K
low184 FPS84 FPS
medium147 FPS68 FPS
high122 FPS55 FPS
ultra92 FPS39 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) and Radeon 890M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.

AMD

Radeon 890M

The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) scores 8,160 and the Radeon 890M reaches 8,175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 890M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 1,024 (Radeon 890M). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 16 (Radeon 890M) with 96 Tensor cores.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
G3D Mark Score
8,160
8,175
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
5 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
3072+200%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.61 TFLOPS+95%
5.939 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1890 MHz
2900 MHz+53%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
96+50%
64
L1 Cache
3 MB+1100%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
24+50%
16

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 890M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 890M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 890M) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
VRAM Capacity
6 GB+50%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
System
Bus Width
192-bit
System
L2 Cache
32 MB+1500%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon 890M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
DirectX
12
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
VCN 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
VCN 3.0
Codecs
H.264,H.265
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon 890M's 15W — a 153.8% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon 890M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)Radeon 890M
TDP
115W
15W-87%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
71.0
545.0+668%