
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Popular choices:

Radeon 890M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
Radeon 890M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
2023Radeon 890M
2024Why buy it
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 115W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌666.7% higher power demand at 115W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 890M better than GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) make more sense than Radeon 890M?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 63 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 34 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 34 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 185 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 155 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 66 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 294 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 245 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 79 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 294 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 245 FPS | 147 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 220 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 184 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 39 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) and Radeon 890M

GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1545 MHz to 1890 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,160 points.

Radeon 890M
Radeon 890M
The Radeon 890M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,175 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) scores 8,160 and the Radeon 890M reaches 8,175 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) is built on Ada Lovelace while the Radeon 890M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 5 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 1,024 (Radeon 890M). Raw compute: 11.61 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon 890M). Boost clocks: 1890 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 24 RT cores (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 16 (Radeon 890M) with 96 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,160 | 8,175 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+200% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.61 TFLOPS+95% | 5.939 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1890 MHz | 2900 MHz+53% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+50% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 24+50% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 890M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 890M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 32 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 890M) — the GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 12.2 (Radeon 890M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon 890M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon 890M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) draws 115W versus the Radeon 890M's 15W — a 153.8% difference. The Radeon 890M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon 890M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 (Mobile) | Radeon 890M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 115W | 15W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.0 | 545.0+668% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













