
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
2019Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅49.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 50W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌233.3% higher power demand at 50W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1000 (móvel) better than Radeon 860M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 860M make more sense than Quadro T1000 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 37 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 25 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 73 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 59 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 112 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 90 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 225 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 180 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 112 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1000 (móvel) and Radeon 860M

Quadro T1000 (móvel)
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) scores 5,000 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 2.235 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1455 MHz vs 3000 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,000+3% | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.235 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | 3000 MHz+106% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+1100% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 860M has 2 GB. The Quadro T1000 (móvel) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1000 (móvel) draws 50W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 15W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 322.5+223% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 860M is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro T1000 (móvel) | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | TU117 | Krackan Point |
| Release | May 27 2019 | Marchar 2025 |
| Ranking | #374 | #449 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













