
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Popular choices:

Radeon 860M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
2019Radeon 860M
2025Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 860M better than GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 43 FPS | 37 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 9 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 30 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 19 FPS | 16 FPS |
| high | 11 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 15 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 10 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 23 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 34 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 23 FPS |
| ultra | 11 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 10 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 7 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 6 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 4 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 173 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 144 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 162 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 78 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 27 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon 860M

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

Radeon 860M
Radeon 860M
The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 3000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,800 | 4,838 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+50% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.215 TFLOPS | 3.072 TFLOPS+39% |
| Boost Clock | 1442 MHz | 3000 MHz+108% |
| ROPs | 24+200% | 8 |
| TMUs | 48+50% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 288 KB+350% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 84 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB | Radeon 860M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 64.0 | 322.5+404% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












