GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB vs Radeon 860M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019Core: 1366 MHzBoost: 1442 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 860M

2025Core: 600 MHzBoost: 3000 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 860M

2025

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 860M better than GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB?
Yes. Radeon 860M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 4,838 vs 4,800 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 860M is a 2025 card with FSR upscaling, while GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 860M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Radeon 860M can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Radeon 860M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 860M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.8% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and FSR upscaling.
Is GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 860M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
1080p
low43 FPS37 FPS
medium28 FPS23 FPS
high21 FPS17 FPS
ultra14 FPS9 FPS
1440p
low30 FPS28 FPS
medium19 FPS16 FPS
high11 FPS9 FPS
ultra8 FPS5 FPS
4K
low15 FPS11 FPS
medium10 FPS7 FPS
high6 FPS4 FPS
ultra4 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
1080p
low81 FPS95 FPS
medium50 FPS61 FPS
high37 FPS40 FPS
ultra23 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low34 FPS62 FPS
medium24 FPS32 FPS
high15 FPS23 FPS
ultra11 FPS18 FPS
4K
low10 FPS25 FPS
medium7 FPS14 FPS
high6 FPS12 FPS
ultra4 FPS9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
1080p
low216 FPS218 FPS
medium173 FPS174 FPS
high144 FPS145 FPS
ultra108 FPS109 FPS
1440p
low162 FPS163 FPS
medium130 FPS131 FPS
high108 FPS109 FPS
ultra81 FPS82 FPS
4K
low108 FPS109 FPS
medium86 FPS87 FPS
high72 FPS72 FPS
ultra54 FPS49 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
1080p
low216 FPS149 FPS
medium173 FPS116 FPS
high144 FPS98 FPS
ultra108 FPS78 FPS
1440p
low162 FPS103 FPS
medium130 FPS82 FPS
high108 FPS69 FPS
ultra81 FPS53 FPS
4K
low102 FPS62 FPS
medium78 FPS49 FPS
high68 FPS39 FPS
ultra51 FPS27 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB and Radeon 860M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1366 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,800 points.

AMD

Radeon 860M

The Radeon 860M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Marchar 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 3000 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,838 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB scores 4,800 and the Radeon 860M reaches 4,838 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB is built on Pascal while the Radeon 860M uses RDNA 3.5, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 512 (Radeon 860M). Raw compute: 2.215 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 3.072 TFLOPS (Radeon 860M). Boost clocks: 1442 MHz vs 3000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
G3D Mark Score
4,800
4,838
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.5
Process Node
14 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.215 TFLOPS
3.072 TFLOPS+39%
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
3000 MHz+108%
ROPs
24+200%
8
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
288 KB+350%
64 KB
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 860M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 96-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 1 MB (Radeon 860M) — the Radeon 860M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
84 GB/s
System
Bus Width
96-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.75 MB
1 MB+33%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB draws 75W versus the Radeon 860M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 860M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB) vs 350W (Radeon 860M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GBRadeon 860M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
64.0
322.5+404%