
GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Why buy it
- ✅81.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1060
2016Radeon 8040S
2025Why buy it
- ✅81.3% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $151 less on MSRP ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 24.4 G3D/$ ($249 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 180W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌227.3% higher power demand at 180W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌60.6% HIGHER MSRP$400 MSRPvs$249 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 24.4 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $249 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1060 better than Radeon 8040S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 8040S make more sense than GeForce GTX 1060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 64 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 55 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 216 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 148 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 17 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 453 FPS | 320 FPS |
| medium | 362 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 302 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 340 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 226 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 181 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 57 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 358 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 260 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 226 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 299 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 170 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 46 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 and Radeon 8040S

GeForce GTX 1060
GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon 8040S
Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 scores 10,064 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,064+3% | 9,756 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+150% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS+55% | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 2800 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+150% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 8040S relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 8040S has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: NVDEC (Pascal) vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Pascal) | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 draws 180W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 106.4% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 173mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 55W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 173mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 55.9 | 177.4+217% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 MSRP, while the Radeon 8040S launched at $400. The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 37.8% less ($151 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce GTX 1060) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 65.6% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $249-38% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+66% | 24.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | Strix Halo |
| Release | May 27 2016 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #137 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













