Quadro T2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅39.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 60W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌300% higher power demand at 60W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T2000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro T2000 (móvel) better than Radeon 780M?

Yes. Quadro T2000 (móvel) is clearly the better overall GPU here. Quadro T2000 (móvel) averages 39.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 6,959 vs 6,906 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Quadro T2000 (móvel) is a 2019 card with no meaningful modern upscaling stack, while Radeon 780M is a 2024 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 780M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. Quadro T2000 (móvel) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $500 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 39.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 0.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%. Radeon 780M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 60W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon 780M make more sense than Quadro T2000 (móvel)?

Yes. Radeon 780M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 60W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro T2000 (móvel). The trade-off is that Quadro T2000 (móvel) currently gives you 0.8% higher G3D Mark and 39.1% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 100+%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T2000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Radeon 780M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
1080p
low	99 FPS	93 FPS
medium	88 FPS	78 FPS
high	75 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	62 FPS	43 FPS
1440p
low	91 FPS	80 FPS
medium	77 FPS	68 FPS
high	64 FPS	51 FPS
ultra	53 FPS	32 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	29 FPS
medium	42 FPS	27 FPS
high	31 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	28 FPS	16 FPS

Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)Open Radeon 780M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
1080p
low	195 FPS	96 FPS
medium	165 FPS	67 FPS
high	129 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	136 FPS	67 FPS
medium	111 FPS	45 FPS
high	90 FPS	33 FPS
ultra	73 FPS	23 FPS
4K
low	80 FPS	35 FPS
medium	66 FPS	25 FPS
high	54 FPS	20 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	13 FPS

Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)Open Radeon 780M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
1080p
low	313 FPS	310 FPS
medium	251 FPS	249 FPS
high	209 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	155 FPS
1440p
low	235 FPS	227 FPS
medium	188 FPS	186 FPS
high	157 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	117 FPS	117 FPS
4K
low	146 FPS	137 FPS
medium	125 FPS	123 FPS
high	88 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	59 FPS

Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)Open Radeon 780M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
1080p
low	289 FPS	173 FPS
medium	224 FPS	136 FPS
high	196 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	157 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	220 FPS	119 FPS
medium	167 FPS	96 FPS
high	138 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	103 FPS	71 FPS
medium	76 FPS	57 FPS
high	67 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	33 FPS

Open Quadro T2000 (móvel)Open Radeon 780M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T2000 (móvel) and Radeon 780M

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) scores 6,959 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is built on Turing while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
G3D Mark Score	6,959	6,906
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	12 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.656 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+144%
Boost Clock	1785 MHz	2900 MHz+62%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the Radeon 780M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	256-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).

Feature	Quadro T2000 (móvel)	Radeon 780M
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) draws 60W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 120% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.