
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 18W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 18W, a 3W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro T1200 Mobile
2021Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 18W, a 3W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 18W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro T1200 Mobile better than Radeon 760M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Quadro T1200 Mobile?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 25 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 91 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 117 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 74 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 56 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 17 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon 760M

Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1200 Mobile scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,449 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.918 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+82% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz | 2599 MHz+82% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1200 Mobile draws 18W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W | 15W-17% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 305.6 | 363.3+19% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













