Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

Quadro T1200 Mobile

2021Core: 855 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 20% higher power demand at 18W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 18W, a 3W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Quadro T1200 Mobile better than Radeon 760M?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,500 vs 5,449 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Quadro T1200 Mobile is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2021, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 12nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro T1200 Mobile can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around Unknown MSRP. Quadro T1200 Mobile is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Quadro T1200 Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 0.9% higher G3D Mark. Radeon 760M is the newer 2024 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 18W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.
When does Radeon 760M make more sense than Quadro T1200 Mobile?
Yes. Radeon 760M is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (15W vs 18W), future-proofing, and staying closer to an unclear MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Quadro T1200 Mobile. The trade-off is that Quadro T1200 Mobile currently gives you 0.9% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
1080p
low80 FPS46 FPS
medium69 FPS29 FPS
high56 FPS21 FPS
ultra37 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS32 FPS
medium61 FPS19 FPS
high44 FPS11 FPS
ultra28 FPS6 FPS
4K
low25 FPS12 FPS
medium24 FPS8 FPS
high16 FPS5 FPS
ultra14 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
1080p
low161 FPS91 FPS
medium131 FPS64 FPS
high101 FPS44 FPS
ultra74 FPS30 FPS
1440p
low117 FPS58 FPS
medium91 FPS38 FPS
high74 FPS29 FPS
ultra55 FPS21 FPS
4K
low70 FPS30 FPS
medium56 FPS21 FPS
high44 FPS17 FPS
ultra31 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
1080p
low248 FPS245 FPS
medium198 FPS196 FPS
high165 FPS163 FPS
ultra124 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low186 FPS184 FPS
medium148 FPS147 FPS
high124 FPS123 FPS
ultra93 FPS92 FPS
4K
low124 FPS123 FPS
medium99 FPS98 FPS
high82 FPS77 FPS
ultra53 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
1080p
low146 FPS154 FPS
medium116 FPS120 FPS
high97 FPS103 FPS
ultra80 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low104 FPS109 FPS
medium85 FPS87 FPS
high71 FPS74 FPS
ultra57 FPS58 FPS
4K
low62 FPS65 FPS
medium47 FPS52 FPS
high37 FPS42 FPS
ultra28 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

Quadro T1200 Mobile

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1200 Mobile scores 5,500 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,500
5,449
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
12 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1024+100%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.918 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
2599 MHz+82%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1200 Mobile draws 18W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro T1200 MobileRadeon 760M
TDP
18W
15W-17%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
305.6
363.3+19%