
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Radeon 760M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Radeon 760M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon 760M better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 88 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 79 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 55 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 12 FPS |
| medium | 35 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 21 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 175 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 59 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 46 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 181 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 53 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 120 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 109 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 30 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Radeon 760M

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M
The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 2599 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,353 | 5,449+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152+125% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.974 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS+79% |
| Boost Clock | 1291 MHz | 2599 MHz+101% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 72+125% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 432 KB+238% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB | 2 MB+60% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 15W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4 | 363.3+409% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro P2000 (móvel) | Radeon 760M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $500 | — |
| Codename | GP106 | Phoenix |
| Release | February 15 2019 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #399 | #421 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













