Quadro P2000 (móvel) vs Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1291 MHzBoost: 1291 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Radeon 760M

2024Core: 800 MHzBoost: 2599 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
  • 400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 760M

2024

Why buy it

  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
  • Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon 760M better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?
Yes. Radeon 760M is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 5,449 vs 5,353 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon 760M is a 2024 card with FSR upscaling, while Quadro P2000 (móvel) is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 760M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2019, better upscaling support with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 4nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Quadro P2000 (móvel) can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. Radeon 760M is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon 760M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.8% higher G3D Mark. Moving to an unclear MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (15W vs 75W), and FSR upscaling.
Is Quadro P2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. Quadro P2000 (móvel) is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $500 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon 760M is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR upscaling.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
1080p
low88 FPS46 FPS
medium79 FPS29 FPS
high66 FPS21 FPS
ultra54 FPS12 FPS
1440p
low82 FPS32 FPS
medium71 FPS19 FPS
high55 FPS11 FPS
ultra45 FPS6 FPS
4K
low38 FPS12 FPS
medium35 FPS8 FPS
high24 FPS5 FPS
ultra21 FPS3 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
1080p
low175 FPS87 FPS
medium142 FPS61 FPS
high108 FPS42 FPS
ultra77 FPS29 FPS
1440p
low118 FPS56 FPS
medium91 FPS36 FPS
high70 FPS28 FPS
ultra56 FPS20 FPS
4K
low59 FPS29 FPS
medium46 FPS21 FPS
high37 FPS16 FPS
ultra27 FPS11 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
1080p
low241 FPS245 FPS
medium193 FPS196 FPS
high161 FPS163 FPS
ultra120 FPS123 FPS
1440p
low181 FPS184 FPS
medium145 FPS147 FPS
high120 FPS123 FPS
ultra90 FPS92 FPS
4K
low120 FPS123 FPS
medium96 FPS98 FPS
high80 FPS77 FPS
ultra60 FPS53 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
1080p
low226 FPS154 FPS
medium177 FPS120 FPS
high150 FPS103 FPS
ultra120 FPS81 FPS
1440p
low174 FPS109 FPS
medium135 FPS87 FPS
high109 FPS74 FPS
ultra90 FPS58 FPS
4K
low84 FPS65 FPS
medium63 FPS52 FPS
high52 FPS42 FPS
ultra41 FPS30 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P2000 (móvel) and Radeon 760M

NVIDIA

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

AMD

Radeon 760M

The Radeon 760M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,449 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) scores 5,353 and the Radeon 760M reaches 5,449 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Radeon 760M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 512 (Radeon 760M). Raw compute: 2.974 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 5.323 TFLOPS (Radeon 760M). Boost clocks: 1291 MHz vs 2599 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
G3D Mark Score
5,353
5,449+2%
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1152+125%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.974 TFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS+79%
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
2599 MHz+101%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
72+125%
32
L1 Cache
432 KB+238%
128 KB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (Radeon 760M) — the Radeon 760M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1.25 MB
2 MB+60%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P2000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Radeon 760M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 760M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Radeon 760M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
TDP
75W
15W-80%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
71.4
363.3+409%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 760M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).

FeatureQuadro P2000 (móvel)Radeon 760M
MSRP
$500
Codename
GP106
Phoenix
Release
February 15 2019
January 31 2024
Ranking
#399
#421